Integrity

Reasoning before answers

EconMind OS values transparent reasoning, source awareness, and honest collaboration. A score, a chart, or a completed simulation is useful only when it represents the work actually done and the assumptions actually chosen.

Academic and challenge integrity

• Submit your own reasoning and identify collaborators when a task is collaborative.
• Use sources responsibly and distinguish evidence from assumptions, interpretations, and generated calculations.
• Do not alter, fabricate, or conceal model inputs, results, timestamps, team membership, official attempts, or evidence to obtain an advantage.
• Follow any stated attempt limit, scenario rule, and team-authority boundary. Do not coordinate to bypass a challenge's intended conditions.
• Treat ghost strategies, shared reports, and other released work as learning material, not as content to copy into a current official attempt without attribution or permission.

Review and correction

If an integrity concern affects a challenge, project, or shared record, a platform administrator may review the relevant activity record and take a proportionate action. This can include clarification, correction, removal from a released view, invalidation of an official attempt, or a temporary feature restriction. Affected users may submit context through the Contact form or, if they cannot sign in, admin@econmind.group.